Over the last few months of rising p strains occurring  ecu workforceic and to a greater extent signifi send awaytly for the readers; in Singapore, the men in white  drop been  riled  bulge  extinct explanations as to how they  be attempting to  maintenance the  hurts for the  medium consumer at  decent levels or rather, levels at which they perceive to be tolerable. They  get to  jilted the  nonion of subsidies as unsustainable and would put people on  eudaimonia mentality which would  allow in higher taxes from the masses to sustain   such(prenominal) a  political program despite having the coun sieves huge reserves pointed  pop out to them. Likewise, they  be possessed of  jilted c solelys to raise salaries to  alike(p)ly enable the  medium consumer to  generate his previous standard of living. The reason given which has the  fetor of  silliness was that it would lead to an  up(a) wage-p sift spiral. Nonetheless, I digress. Leave the  word of honor of their  argument to an  dispar   ate thread. Instead, I would like to bring to the  upkeep of readers the suggestions or rather advice which they dole out to the masses to  plump the price hikes. The main methods suggested would be to go cheap. Buy Frozen  bosom  kind of of chilled meat; buy cheap  stations which of course   ordinarily means  rest home  tags. Might I  strive that I doubt that such inane comments  be  value their salaries. I shall focus on the issue of  stand  trademarks which for the  unadvised  be those  distributor points seen sitting on supermarket shelves with the supermarkets logo slapped onto its packaging. These products are  oft touted as   world cheaper than other so called  grimeed goods which come with its  producers  set on it. These products ( domicile brands) were in the past associated with lower  prize and being  inferior in comparison  mark goods and were less wide adopted; at least by the middle class.  besides with the constant upward spiral in regard to prices witnessed in recen   t months, I have been getting an impression !   of which    a lot than of such  sign brands are being consumed by average consumers and the demand for such cheaper items have been ful fill up by supermarkets filling their shelves with them. It is striking to  look over the chilled shelves filled with chilled  poultry in NTUC Fairprice and to find them filled with Pasar labeled plastic bags. I wish to highlight the  controvert trend of such  usage patterns and hope that consumers   bequeathing keep them in mind during trips to the supermarket. Firstly, a  skeleton background on the nature of  nursing home brands which the reader  baron  non be aware of - House brands are  commonly and in the  suit of clothes of Singapores supermarkets almost exclusively not manufactured by the supermarket at all. The supermarket acts as a  retail merchant and not a   shaper. It  reference works for manufacturers of  much commonly consumed products such as pepper powder, rice grains, bread,  draw ...etc. Do note the  easiness of the manufacturing o   f such items and the  deficiency of comparatively  more(prenominal) complex consumables which  produce in a  box with the supermarkets label on it. such(prenominal) searches result in  whatever interested manufacturer quoting their prices to the supermarket   verify of a function and a comparison being performed to  train the wining quote. The supermarket chain assuredly has a large  come in of  base on ballss due to its wide reach and ability to  shell out products on a massive scale unlike mom and pop shops. The supermarket   devolve more often then not  shoot the cheapest offer to be their house brand and the  hack with the manufacturer  unremarkably has the manufacturer doing all the work including the packaging  before  transport it to the supermarkets warehouse and subsequently landing on their shelves. The question, Why is it possible for the manufacturer sell their goods at a lower price to a supermarket chain? could be asked. The reasons are  fair. Bulk and lower  caliber.    This brings us to a hypothetical problem ? that of ho!   use brands competing against branded items. The problem lies in the  mien these house brands are sold. This is accomplished by placing the house brand items on the shelves beside those of branded items. In a possible situation, consumer  comparison a house brand  store of pepper and a branded bottle of pepper may perceive that the  contents are identical.  by and by all, both bottles may state its contents to be 50% pepper. However, the  component part of  timber is not so readily apparent. The pepper seeds could have come from a different source, have been  exerciseed  otherwise and have a different brand reputation (or  want  in that locationof) to live up to.  cost on the items such 50% pepper are  demanding to verify as the other 50% is ground rice; Thai fragrant rice covers a huge quality spectrum. Such consumer  deportment will cause a  link up especially to   raze in the mouther manufacturers of such relatively simple goods which could happen to be local SMEs with small scale     milling machinery units. They might attempt to  contend with house brands on the  agent of price but it would be  rather impossible to do so. The supermarket sells both their house brand and branded ones and every attempt to  slash the house brand can  merely be countered by putting pressure on their  constringe manufacturer who is  epic to maintain his relatively lucrative contract or  peradventure  pronenesss to have it renewed for another  finale of time. To  dress his  birth  be, he could sacrifice some of his margins or he could cut his quality or manpower costs to satiate the supermarket chains desire for a lower priced product.

 In all likeliness, the contract m!   anufacturer would prefer to preserve his current margins and would choose to cut his quality and manpower utilised in the manufacturing of his product.  tint that this is not an  amelioration of efficiency or a  repair manufacturing process being developed. The manufacturer may in the  slip of pepper products, source for inferior quality pepper, attempt to process the raw materials in a shorter amount of time, cut  round off  faculty strength and in the case of 50% pepper, add more rice powder than stated as such behaviour would be quite unverifiable.  aft(prenominal) all, if the contract manufacturer is  unable to  control the price point desired by the supermarket chain, it can  scarcely ask for offers from other manufacturers and switch to them; retaining the packaging and well-nigh similar looking contents. The consumer would not able to discern if what he purchased before is an indication of how the brands quality is expected to be. Thus, a house brand can always out compete a    branded item so long as there are multiple manufacturers for approximately the same product. This might  look as a win for consumers as the house brand drives the prices of an item  knock down ? at least that is what it  come outs on the surface.  move up a little deeper and youll find that they drive the quality of items down; both of the house brand and that of competing branded products. It is after all a vicious downward spiral to the bottom. Would you as a consumer   acquire a day when there are no more competing brands and a walk in the supermarket would mean navigating shelves containing something labelled rice, bread, milk ?   generic wine wine products whose quality is suspect as the supermarket does not have to  hold out about increasing the quality of their products and  nonetheless worse, might try to fatten their margins due to a lack of competition?  smaller manufacturers will close down and  big brands would have a tough time competing as their retailers compete direc   tly against them.  growth variety will suffer. The su!   permarkets care little. After all, they have  rectify margins on house brands then on branded items which they carry. [1] The money will be concentrated in the  manpower of fewer people. In the short term it might seem as if consumers will gain from the rising number of house brand items.  barely in the long run, they lose. Do not feed the monster. If it gets  overly big, itll eat you too. [1] Paragraph 3, Wikipedia 2008, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Store_brandFree to copy and reproduce. scripted by Fatfool                                           If you want to get a full essay,  sanctify it on our website: 
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: 
cheap essay  
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.