Case Brief

Title: Circuit City v. Saint Clair Adams Facts: In 1995 Adams, was go after as a sales counselor, signed an occupation hardheaded exercise with Circuit City. A provision in their application essential all employment disputes to be settled by arbitration. In 1997, Adams cross-filed an employment unlikeness law slip against the comp whatever in body politic court. Circuit City then filed lawsuit in federal official District philander, seeking to distinguish the state-court action and to compel arbitration of Adams claims infra the FAA. The District Court move intoed the requested order. The court think that Adams was obligated by the arbitration conformity. In reversing, the Court of Appeals engraft that the arbitration agreement between Adams and Circuit City was contained in a engage of employment, and thus not subject to the FAA under section 1 of the Act. Issue: The issue is whether an employees statutory rights can be subject to requisite arbitration.

Rule: sectionalisation 1 of the federal Arbitration Act Analysis: below Section 1 of the Federal Arbitration Act contracts of employment of seamen, railroad employees, or any other class of workers pursue in irrelevant or interstate commerce are excluded from the Acts coverage. However since he did not qualify for the exemption, the provision he had agreed to initially when he applied that he would enter arbitration for any disputes will be upheld. Even for discrimination or statutory claims he gave up his right to file a suit in the court system. Conclusion: The U.S. irresponsible Court verbalise that the employees claims based on statutes may be subject to mandato! ry arbitration.If you want to get a skilful essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay